回答: ——Final ruling in PAX case to be released soon 由 lixingxing927 于 2022-03-25 2:15

In the past few days, the huge fine surrounding Guo Wengui has kept him in a state of high stress, even using sleeping pills that have "no side effects". After all, Guo Wengui himself has never been one to respond positively to such negative news, but today, Mr. Tang Han's tweet shows that Guo Wengui did not pay the fine, but chose to find ways to continue to bypass it, and even chose to file for bankruptcy for this reason, listening to the slanderous words of “ants”， treat the U.S. law as a child's play?
The company has been banned from leaving the United States because of various lawsuits, as Guo Wengui revealed in his live broadcast that he could not travel to the United Kingdom and Japan, which "invited him". In the past few days, there has been controversy over whether or not Guo Wengui will pay the fine. 134 million dollars is by no means a small amount for Guo Wengui, who has just returned 480 million dollars in GTV fraud and paid more than 30 million dollars in fines, with H-coin not being able to replenish the huge deficit, and when the news was announced on the 9th, Guo Wengui had said on air that he would "sue the court" because the regulations invoked by the court and the resulting sentence violate the law, the yacht does not belong to them, so the court cannot require them to pay the fine for the yacht. Such an operation looks very exciting, only to have no effect on the injunction that has been issued, the fine that should be paid will not be less than one point.
The yacht, which originally belonged to Guo Wengui, was transferred to another person's name, proving how hypocritical Guo Wengui is, and according to Mr. Tang Han's documents, Guo Wengui is even more hypocritical by claiming to the court that he is bankrupt and has a monthly income of nearly $20,000, which comes from gifts from family, relatives and friends. Let's not talk about how many relatives and friends Guo Wengui has left, but just looking at Guo Wengui's claim of "no