回刀总的帖 以正视听。 科学人员实事求是 不像各家川文宣们无中生有 造谣生事。 6park.com
原文：
“2020年1月，美国最大生物医学研究机构负责人给福奇发了一封电子邮件，称这种病毒的“不寻常特征”或许表明，
它是“被设计出来的”。福奇为此表示，他将通过电话进行沟通” 6park.com
这个引文是Kristian Andersen，Scripps的一个教授，1月底写给Fauci的， 全文如下。重点是 Kristian Andersen 在研究
了这个问题后， 三月份以第一作者在Nature Medicine发表 COVID 应该是自然来的。  6park.com
“ Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.”
- Andersen, K.G.， et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med 26, 450–452 (2020) 6park.com
From: Kristian G. Andersen 
Sent : Friday, January 31, 2020 10:32 PM 
To: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAID) [E) 
Cc: Jeremy Farrar
Subject : Re: FW: Science: Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak 's origins Hi Tony,
Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw th is earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it . It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at indivi dual residues, except if they are completely of f. On a phylogenetic t ree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir . The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (  <0.1%  ) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.
We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend . I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent wit h expectations from evolutionary theory . But we have t o look at this much more closely and th ere are still further analyses to be done, so tho se opinions could still change.
Best,
Kristian 6park.com


贴主:白糖糖于2021_06_04 11:01:51编辑