[返回军事纵横首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[版主管理]
关于中美的核武对话,还是看原文吧,到底说的啥?
送交者: 甲骨[★★声望品衔9★★] 于 2024-06-21 10:12 已读 1178 次  

甲骨的个人频道

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2024-06-20/exclusive-u-s-and-china-hold-first-informal-nuclear-talks-in-5-years-eyeing-taiwan 6park.com

主观臆测不算,基本引述中国官员的话,看怎么说的: 6park.com

台湾,基本说不用核武,肯定打赢 - 打不赢怎么办,没说。那么广岛那颗,是啥说辞呢?
"They told the U.S. side that they were absolutely convinced that they are able to prevail in a conventional fight over Taiwan without using nuclear weapons," said scholar David Santoro, the U.S. organiser of the Track Two talks, the details of which are being reported by Reuters for the first time. 6park.com

核武政策,中方没有部署美国那么多核武的兴趣,中方的政策没改,美方夸大其词。 6park.com

Santoro said the Chinese delegates told U.S. representatives that Beijing maintained these policies and that "'we are not interested in reaching nuclear parity with you, let alone superiority.'"  6park.com

"'Nothing has changed, business as usual, you guys are exaggerating'," Santoro said in summarising Beijing's position. 6park.com

中国不进行任何具体政策的讨论
Bejing's "refusal to substantively engage" in discussions over its nuclear build-up raises questions around its "already ambiguous stated "no-first-use" policy and its nuclear doctrine more broadly," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters.  6park.com

中国的核武,和美国比还差的很远,远远不够
One Chinese delegate "pointed to studies that said Chinese nuclear weapons were still vulnerable to U.S. strikes - their second-strike capability was not enough", said Morris.
喜欢甲骨朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!
[举报反馈]·[ 甲骨的个人频道 ]·[-->>参与评论回复]·[用户前期主贴]·[手机扫描浏览分享]·[返回军事纵横首页]
帖子内容是网友自行贴上分享,如果您认为其中内容违规或者侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系,我们核实后会第一时间删除。

所有跟帖:        ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


用户名:密码:[--注册ID--]

标 题:

粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


     图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助

手机扫描进入,浏览分享更畅快!

楼主本栏目热帖推荐:

>>>>查看更多楼主社区动态...





[ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 版主申请 ] [ Contact us ]