回答: 中国的防空识别区不符合国际法 由 hotguyintown 于 2013-11-28 16:16

转自http://top81.ws/show.php?f=1&t=1472102&m=11647424

简单的说这段中文论断是bull shit，里面引用的是wiki里关于美国识别区的介绍，但它却只引用了其中一段，来证明自己的论点，而不是引用全部。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air ... %28North_America%29

关于美国识别区的介绍全文：

The United States formally defines an ADIZ in the Code of Federal Regulations（这比上面指责中国的文章中提到的navy commander handbook要重要的多，因为它是法律）: 14 CFR Part 99.[1] Furthermore 14 CFR Part 99.49 states "All airspace of the United States is designated as Defense Area", in which by definition the control of aircraft is required for reasons of national security. Therefore the ADIZ forms a transition zone in which aircraft come under positive identification and control by air traffic and defense authorities. 14 C.F.R. 99.11a states "No person may operate an aircraft into, within, or from a departure point within an ADIZ, unless the person files, activates, and closes a flight plan with the appropriate aeronautical facility, or is otherwise authorized by air traffic control", which appears to claim authority over all aircraft in the external U.S. ADIZ regardless of destination.

（上面解释了法律角度上美国对识别区的定义，简单的说就是美国要控制所有自己识别区的空域。紧接着下面是一段根据海军commander handbook的解释，这只能理解为一个军种具体实施时的实际操作指引，但不等于美国不claim这些权力。而这种指引也不能凌驾于法律之上。最重要的是，一旦出现需求，立即就可以改成严格按照法律来实施对进入识别区的飞机的控制。中国提出的要求只是报备，实际上民航航班具体飞行信息基本是固定而已知的，这并没有对民航额外强加其它要求。）

However, the U.S. Navy's Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations states the ADIZ applies only to commercial aircraft intending to enter U.S. sovereign airspace, with a basis in international law of "the right of a nation to establish reasonable conditions of entry into its territory".[4] The manual specifically instructs U.S. military aircraft to ignore the ADIZ of other states when operating in coastal areas:

The United States does not recognize the right of a coastal nation to apply its ADIZ procedures to foreign aircraft not intending to enter national airspace nor does the United States apply its ADIZ procedures to foreign aircraft not intending to enter U.S. airspace. Accordingly, U.S. military aircraft not intending to enter national airspace should not identify themselves or otherwise comply with ADIZ procedures established by other nations, unless the United States has specifically agreed to do so.

（紧接着下面讲述了美军在实际操作中如何对待外国军用飞机 —— 注意，在上面指责中国的文章中，引用了wiki的其中一段，却恰恰没有去引用非常重要的、美国把军民飞机区别对待的这段，这对读者是很大的误导。实际上识别区真正管的是军用飞机，因为民航机的航班信息是已知的。下面这段恰恰证明了美国在识别区里对外国军用飞机实施严密的控制，而指责中国的文章中说提到的“自由”，仅仅是针对和平时期人畜无害的民航机。）

Meanwhile in actual practice the U.S. does attempt to apply its external ADIZ to military aircraft which pass through its extended ADIZ without intending to enter U.S. sovereign territory [1][dead link]. A U.S. Air Force university dissertation states:

These regulations do not pertain to military aircraft, but to enter US airspace, without inducing the scrambling of fighter interceptors, these rules must be complied with and followed. The US does not claim sovereignty over these zones per se, but does closely monitor and request information of all objects entering the zone.[5]

综上所述，下面这段也就更加纯粹的bull shit了：
（摘录一段：）同时，美国在实践中，也不要求只是飞越防空识别区的外国飞机遵从其为本国飞机制定的程序。美国尽管空军实力强大，也会对进入防空识别区的外国飞行器进行监控，但从来没有试图在法律上去管理一块不属于自己的空域。美国帮助日本设立的防空识别区也是如此。（摘录结束）

任何一个熟悉一点军事和冷战历史的网友都知道，美加识别区和日本识别区就是西方和苏军冷对抗最激烈的空域，如果象文章所说美国“从来没有试图在法律上去管理一块不属于自己的空域”，那么无数在识别区监视拦截苏军侦察机的美军战斗机是去干吗的呢？天上可没有酱油铺。